Stop guessing.
Start evaluating.

Bring role-specific questions, candidate work, live interviewing, and AI assessment into one place. Your team sets the bar and makes the hiring decision.

In development · Built with company workflows in mind

From the first question
to a considered decision

Configure the round, see how candidates work, and review their answers with AI scores and your own judgment.

01
Set up the round

Create or clone an interview. Set the role, skills, experience, question mix, difficulty, and duration, then assign a moderator.

02
AI generates questions

Generate coding, debugging, theoretical, and multiple-choice questions around the role and skills you want to assess.

03
Candidate takes the interview

Invite the candidate to a browser workspace with code, Markdown, and whiteboard tools. Questions and submitted answers stay together.

04
Guide the round live

Observe candidate work, take notes, and prepare follow-ups. Add questions next or to the queue; preview and drop queued, unanswered ones.

05
AI evaluates & grades

Review scores and remarks alongside submitted answers. Inspect strengths, gaps, and the overall assessment in Insights.

06
You make the call

Add your own scores, comments, and hiring recommendation. AI supports the assessment; your team owns the decision.

A shared workspace.
A clearer view of the candidate.

Current capabilities, from interview setup to human review.

Watch candidates code — in real time

Follow the candidate's code and whiteboard as they work. Keep the question and interviewer tools alongside the workspace.

Paste restrictions Tab-switch tracking Inactivity detection Fullscreen prompts
Set the rules for the round

Configure paste restrictions and fullscreen requirements. Review browser activity signals with the candidate's work.

Questions shaped around the role

Use skills, experience, difficulty, and available time to shape the question set. Include debugging tasks and sample inputs.

Review the answer behind the score

Inspect AI scores and remarks, then add human scores and comments alongside the candidate's submitted answer.

Code, write, or sketch

A code editor, Markdown answers, and an Excalidraw whiteboard. Editable dictation for theoretical answers is in development.

Follow up on what matters

Turn suggested next steps or your own instructions into a follow-up draft. You choose what to ask next and what to queue.

Candidate help, on your terms

Enable programming hints and code-quality feedback on readability, security, and best practices. Candidates also have a personal scratchpad.

Browser activity.
With context, not assumptions.

Review time away and focus changes alongside the answers. These are signals for the interviewer to consider, not a cheating verdict.

5
Activity events
2m33s
Time away
2
Focus changes
Activity Feed Example data
Lost focus 16:02:06 → 16:02:11 5s
Offline 16:02:49 → 16:02:59 10s
Offline 16:03:55 → 16:04:54 59s
Lost focus 16:05:00 → 16:06:00 60s
Offline 16:06:20 → 16:06:39 19s
Restrict external pasting

Apply the interview's paste setting in the candidate editor. Set the expectation for how candidates should work.

Track inactivity & tab switches

See recorded focus changes and time away in the activity view, with timestamps and durations for review.

Request fullscreen

Ask candidates to work in fullscreen. If they leave, prompt them to return and record the time outside it.

Choose the candidate's assistance

Turn programming hints and code-quality feedback on or off. Quality feedback covers style and practices, not correctness.

Different roles.
A shared interview workflow.

Match the question format to the work you want to understand. Here are ways to structure technical, visual, and written rounds.

Engineering

Assess coding, debugging, and system-design reasoning through code and whiteboard answers.

Technical
Design

Sketch flows, discuss product decisions, and explain trade-offs on a shared whiteboard.

Visual
Sales & BD

Explore written pitches, objection-handling approaches, and customer scenarios with interviewer-led questions.

Written
Operations

Explore prioritisation, process decisions, and written analysis through questions shaped around the role.

Written

AI recommends.
You decide.

Read the submitted answers, compare them with AI feedback, and add your own scores and hiring recommendation.

Insights — example candidate Example data
70%
Score14.0 / 20
Activity events5
Time away2m 33s
Overall Evaluation
Explains the main approach and implements the common case.
The answer needs more detail on duplicate inputs and edge cases.
A follow-up on trade-offs would help complete the assessment.

Try a recommendation. This example does not save data.

Review the AI assessment

Inspect answer scores and remarks, then read the overall evaluation. Keep the candidate's actual work in view.

You always have the final word

Add human scores, written comments, and a hiring verdict. Your judgment remains part of the assessment.

Revisit the session

Review saved answers and session activity, including submissions, hint requests, and code-quality analyses.

Account for AI usage

See input and output tokens by provider, plus transcription minutes, in the interview's usage card.

See what Eval does.
Explore where it's going.

Explore the current product and the proposed roadmap. ATS screening workflows and conversational AI interviews are planned next steps.